Showing posts with label Lydia Wilson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lydia Wilson. Show all posts

Sunday, 6 March 2011

The Heretic ***

Having not been to the Royal Court before it would be remiss if I didn’t mention how pleasant the space is before I begin a thorough review of the show. Although I’m not sure any other space could pull off the brown décor it suited the theatre well and the seats were easily some of the most comfortable I have endured. Well done, Royal Court. But should I say well done, Heretic? I’m not as convinced.
      
There are a number of things that are deserving of praise. The cast is, at least on paper, very capable. Juliet Stevenson and James Fleet are standing out here as well as Lydia Wilson who gave a terrific performance in the recent Blasted at the Lyric Hammersmith. The other cast members are less well known but are just as capable and suited to their roles, particularly Geoff, played by Adrian Hood. I wasn’t a big fan of Johnny Flynn as Ben, however, as he seemed a bit too extreme. A bit too much of a characterisation that didn’t take into account the conflicts within the character and in his more emotional scenes I didn’t feel any form of compassion for him at all, which is clearly not a good thing.
      
The larger names were clearly looked on to lead the rest of the cast and they certainly tried but as with all of the characters there was something missing, something that didn’t work.
      

This problem is hard to define. It’s as if they have all developed a character but have not done so with any guidance from anyone privy to the group development. The result is that they have all fallen into the trap of stereotyping the character, making them very wooden in the process. They are all undoubtedly the characters they are meant to be but they do not fit together and they do not fit the show. The relationships between them, especially the two senior cast members, should have been a lot more fully developed than they were. There were so many nuances that would have developed over the years they had known each other and they could have played the audience very well regarding the question of Phoebe’s parentage. With no father present and Kevin being Diane’s only known partner it raises a possible dimension that was completely ignored.
      
For me, the blame for this lack of unity falls on the shoulders of Jeremy Herrin, the director. Ensuring the cast works in harmony with each other and the script and the chosen major ideas is the main job the director has and I think this has been missed or ignored. The script still shines through but it seems as if the characters on stage are doing the bare minimum to bring it out, letting it do all the work and going through the motions of their jobs as actors as opposed to the events that inform and inflict their characters.
      
The script is obviously terrific. From the beginning it is witty and laugh out loud funny, delighting in linguistic twists that remind me of a Tom Stoppard play. The situations it develops are equally hilarious while balancing it with tension. I have often and will often refer to balance being the hallmark of greatness in art in any form and this script is a good example of balance. The scene where Diane is facing disciplinary action on mental health grounds is made both hilarious and tragic with the introduction of Maude, a colleague’s soft toy polar bear. The scene was my favourite in the production, with Juliet Stevenson bringing Maude in with so many inferences and implications that I couldn’t help laughing at her.
      
My only criticisms of the script would be the short final act that doesn’t tie up any of the loose ends and is completely out of the blue, not really justifying itself within what is a generally superb plot. I felt as if more explanation was needed, particularly of the militia behind the death threats and the character of Geoff but since there was no explanation forthcoming I suppose we must be left to our own devices on that one.
      
Note to self, add Outstanding New Script award to the Tipsy Hippo Theatre Awards.
      
The technical aspects of the show were strong. The scene changes were swift and well executed, the strobe lighting accompanying the arrival of the helicopter was particularly dramatic and the following scene was subtly and effectively staged. The show does also involve music in the form of a song written by the Ben character and performed with his acoustic guitar. It is a scene well played and has a good effect. Its reprise via recording in the dramatic helicopter scene change was not so well suited and I would have avoided that.
      
The small amount of fighting towards the end was, I feel, characteristic of the whole show. It was just badly put together. It was obvious not only that when Phoebe was punching her mother that she wasn’t doing so very hard at all, but also that when Diane fell she was blatantly falling to where she had been shown to, falling slowly and softly, breaking her fall almost before she even began. Not only that but when she was hit with a wine bottle it was clear that it was plastic. With things like that, if you’re not going to do it well then don’t do it. The audience won’t buy in to shoddily constructed realities no matter how good the script is and although the script was very good indeed, the characters and the production weren’t up to the same standard.


Written by Richard Bean; Directed by Jeremy Herrin; at the Royal Court; Starring Juliet Stevenson, James Fleet, Lydia Wilson, Johnny Flynn, Adrian Hood and Leah Whitaker; Runs from 4 Feb 11 - 19 Mar 11.


John Ord (05/03/2011)

Thursday, 18 November 2010

Blasted ****

Much has been said of Sarah Kane and her hard-hitting and often unintelligible approach to theatre (especially in 4.48 Psychosis) but in this revival of Blasted from Sean Holmes, the central voice of her work speaks through the intensity and the horrifying events within the play. Sarah Kane herself was a traumatized person, suffering for years with severe depression that eventually led to her suicide in 1999; four years after Blasted had it’s debut performance at the Royal Court Theatre Upstairs. Heralded by Aleks Sierz as a figure at the forefront of the movement in the 1990s that he dubbed ‘in-yer-face’ theatre (theatre that is designed to be vulgar, shocking and confrontational as a means of affecting an audience on a deep and challenging emotional level) she holds a special place in the history of British theatre writing. This revival of Blasted certainly gives this style a hearty and strong re-introduction to the London scene.
      
The curtain opens onto a simple and elegant set that is undoubtedly the most pleasant and ‘regular’ moment in the show. It gives the impression of a clean and simple lifestyle, which is something that is completely destroyed by the end of the play when the bomb-ravaged hotel is nothing but a ruined shell with a grave-to-be in the centre surrounded by death and debris. The set change to the ruins after the second scene is executed very well, with the sudden increase in space and lack of the lighting that dominated the previous scenes being an omen of what evils were to take place in the suddenly desperate world that had been hidden from us before.
      
The acting was as raw as the material. The stage being set in a simple way allowed the actors to explore the material to a full extent without worrying about props and the like; a string of good decisions from director Sean Holmes facilitating such necessary freedom. Aiden Kelly’s ‘Soldier’ was as harsh and brutal as a cold winter morning, breaking into the action with an assault rifle and instantly upping the tempo and changing the dynamic with unquestionable authority. Suddenly the balance of power shifted utterly and full credit goes to Aiden Kelly for his efforts to make the character so harsh as well as having to lie still and dead on stage for what must have given him far too much time to think about the play and the events therein.
      
Lydia Wilson’s ‘Cate’ was also subjected to a harrowing story. From her entrance I was aware that she was a young girl, probably about sixteen, not of the greatest intellect and also suffering from quite a serious stammer as well as intermittent fainting spells. Her story drags her from an uncomfortable relationship with Ian to offering herself to soldiers to abuse at will in return for food and drink at the end, returning to her helpless companion at the end, lost in a harsh reality too far out of her depth to survive for long. For someone so fresh out of drama school it was a very commendable outing.
      
However, special commendation has to be given to Danny Webb for his ‘Ian’. A character that must be horrendously demanding to play has not stood between him and a poignant and assured performance that stands to his credit. His series of transitions from being in control and assured of his opinions and beliefs but fearful of death to all his fears being realised and his sudden humbling were all taken in an able stride as he dominated the stage with his human reality. He managed to understand and communicate a character struggling to understand himself and facing so many things that he doesn’t know how to deal with in such a way that we, as the audience to his suffering, connect with him, identify with his pain and suffer with him; a remarkable achievement.
      
The play progresses from mild snaps of anger and vulgarity through hints of suggested violence and violation to horrific displays of sex, rape, torture and cannibalism on stage before the end, certainly shocking the audience to the core. As I seated myself in the auditorium I became aware of a flock of schoolgirls behind me, clearly on a school trip of some description. It seemed that they had more knowledge of what to expect than I (having no knowledge of the play at all going in) as they were saying that they were scared and didn’t know what to expect. Almost two hours of nervous laughter, screaming and hearty gasping later they were utterly silenced and I think that this is the effect that Kane would have desired her work had. Stunned silence all round. To think that man is capable of such ‘evil’ is surely a disturbing thought and it definitely disturbed, both the gabble behind me and myself as well. Deeply.
      
The show is a challenge to watch and is certainly successful in its intention to shock and silence us. A first rate revival with actors doing a superb job ensures the lasting success of the legacy of the troubled author and puts a notch in the positive column for the Lyric, Hammersmith. A daring production of what is, in essence, an incredibly grim play.
      
Grim, but well worth a visit if you’re open to being shocked and appalled, which you should be.


Written by Sarah Kane; Directed by Sean Holmes; at the Lyric, Hammersmith; starring Danny Webb, Aiden Kelly and Lydia Wilson, running 22 October 2010 - 20 November 2010.

http://www.lyric.co.uk/whats-on/production/blasted/


John Ord   (17/11/2010)